AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i5-4460
Our index puts the Intel Core i5-4460 roughly 39% ahead of the AMD FX-6300. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD FX-6300 | Intel Core i5-4460 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Generation | Piledriver | 4th Gen (Haswell) |
| Multi-thread index | 23 | 32 (better) |
| Single-thread index | 43 | 65 (better) |
| Cores | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Threads | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Base clock | 3.5 GHz (better) | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.1 GHz (better) | 3.4 GHz |
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1150 |
| TDP | 95 W | 84 W (better) |
| Release year | 2012 | 2014 (better) |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Games follow single-thread. For gaming, the single-thread index matters more than core count.
- Creative work follows multi-thread. Rendering, compiling and encoding scale with cores.
- Sockets differ. Moving between platforms usually means a new motherboard and often new memory.