AMD FX-6300 vs AMD FX-8350
Our index puts the AMD FX-8350 roughly 35% ahead of the AMD FX-6300. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD FX-6300 | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Generation | Piledriver | Piledriver |
| Multi-thread index | 23 | 31 (better) |
| Single-thread index | 43 | 46 (better) |
| Cores | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Threads | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Base clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.0 GHz (better) |
| Boost clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz (better) |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM3+ |
| TDP | 95 W (better) | 125 W |
| Release year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Games follow single-thread. For gaming, the single-thread index matters more than core count.
- Creative work follows multi-thread. Rendering, compiling and encoding scale with cores.
- Sockets differ. Moving between platforms usually means a new motherboard and often new memory.