AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-9400F
Our index puts the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 roughly 11% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9400F. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Generation | Zen+ | 9th Gen (Coffee Lake Refresh) |
| Multi-thread index | 68 (better) | 61 |
| Single-thread index | 79 | 85 (better) |
| Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Threads | 12 (better) | 6 |
| Base clock | 3.4 GHz (better) | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz (better) |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| Release year | 2018 | 2019 (better) |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Games follow single-thread. For gaming, the single-thread index matters more than core count.
- Creative work follows multi-thread. Rendering, compiling and encoding scale with cores.
- Sockets differ. Moving between platforms usually means a new motherboard and often new memory.