AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU)
Our index puts the AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) roughly 38% ahead of the Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU). This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Xe LP |
| Relative performance index | 36 (better) | 26 |
| Video memory | Shared | Shared |
| Memory type | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Memory bus | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Release year | 2022 (better) | 2020 |
| Board power | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Hardware ray tracing | Yes | No |
| Upscaling support | FSR 3 | XeSS |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Check video memory, not just speed. A faster card with less VRAM can perform worse in recent titles at high texture settings.
- Check power and clearance. Confirm your PSU and case can take the card — the build checker does this.
- Upscaling support differs. DLSS is NVIDIA-only; FSR and XeSS run more broadly.
Other comparisons
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs Intel Arc Graphics (integrated, Meteor Lake)
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- AMD Radeon 680M (integrated) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050