AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Our index puts the AMD Radeon R9 390 roughly 38% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD Radeon R9 390 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 2 | Turing |
| Relative performance index | 66 (better) | 48 |
| Video memory | 8 GB (better) | 4 GB |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bus | 512-bit (better) | 128-bit |
| Release year | 2015 | 2019 (better) |
| Board power | 275 W | 75 W (better) |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 300 W (better) |
| Hardware ray tracing | No | No |
| Upscaling support | Not recorded | FSR 3, XeSS |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Check video memory, not just speed. A faster card with less VRAM can perform worse in recent titles at high texture settings.
- Check power and clearance. Confirm your PSU and case can take the card — the build checker does this.
- Upscaling support differs. DLSS is NVIDIA-only; FSR and XeSS run more broadly.
Other comparisons
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
- AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060