AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs AMD FX-6300
Our index puts the AMD FX-6300 roughly 35% ahead of the AMD Phenom II X4 965. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD Phenom II X4 965 | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Generation | K10 | Piledriver |
| Multi-thread index | 17 | 23 (better) |
| Single-thread index | 39 | 43 (better) |
| Cores | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Threads | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Base clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz (better) |
| Boost clock | Not recorded | 4.1 GHz |
| Socket | AM3 | AM3+ |
| TDP | 125 W | 95 W (better) |
| Release year | 2009 | 2012 (better) |
| Integrated graphics | No | No |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Games follow single-thread. For gaming, the single-thread index matters more than core count.
- Creative work follows multi-thread. Rendering, compiling and encoding scale with cores.
- Sockets differ. Moving between platforms usually means a new motherboard and often new memory.