NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU)
Our index puts the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 roughly 31% ahead of the Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU). This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics (integrated, 96 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Xe LP |
| Relative performance index | 34 (better) | 26 |
| Video memory | 2 GB (better) | Shared |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not recorded |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | Not recorded |
| Release year | 2015 | 2020 (better) |
| Board power | 90 W | Not recorded |
| Suggested PSU | 350 W | Not recorded |
| Hardware ray tracing | No | No |
| Upscaling support | Not recorded | XeSS |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Check video memory, not just speed. A faster card with less VRAM can perform worse in recent titles at high texture settings.
- Check power and clearance. Confirm your PSU and case can take the card — the build checker does this.
- Upscaling support differs. DLSS is NVIDIA-only; FSR and XeSS run more broadly.
Other comparisons
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Arc Graphics (integrated, Meteor Lake)
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon 680M (integrated)
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050