NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc Graphics (integrated, Meteor Lake)
Our index puts the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 roughly 33% ahead of the Intel Arc Graphics (integrated, Meteor Lake). This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | Intel Arc Graphics (integrated, Meteor Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | Intel |
| Architecture | Turing | Xe LPG |
| Relative performance index | 48 (better) | 36 |
| Video memory | 4 GB (better) | Shared |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not recorded |
| Memory bus | 128-bit | Not recorded |
| Release year | 2019 | 2023 (better) |
| Board power | 75 W | Not recorded |
| Suggested PSU | 300 W | Not recorded |
| Hardware ray tracing | No | Yes |
| Upscaling support | FSR 3, XeSS | XeSS |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Check video memory, not just speed. A faster card with less VRAM can perform worse in recent titles at high texture settings.
- Check power and clearance. Confirm your PSU and case can take the card — the build checker does this.
- Upscaling support differs. DLSS is NVIDIA-only; FSR and XeSS run more broadly.
Other comparisons
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon 780M (integrated)
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 570