AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Our index puts the AMD Ryzen 3 3200G roughly 26% ahead of the AMD FX-8350. This is an estimate for ranking, not a measured benchmark, and the gap varies considerably by title and by resolution.
| Specification | AMD FX-8350 | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Generation | Piledriver | Zen+ |
| Multi-thread index | 31 | 39 (better) |
| Single-thread index | 46 | 80 (better) |
| Cores | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Threads | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Base clock | 4.0 GHz (better) | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock | 4.2 GHz (better) | 4.0 GHz |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| TDP | 125 W | 65 W (better) |
| Release year | 2012 | 2019 (better) |
| Integrated graphics | No | Radeon Vega 8 |
Green marks the stronger figure for that row only — for power draw and PSU requirement, lower is treated as better. Performance indexes are CanMyPcPlay estimates; read how they are derived.
Which should you pick?
- Games follow single-thread. For gaming, the single-thread index matters more than core count.
- Creative work follows multi-thread. Rendering, compiling and encoding scale with cores.
- Sockets differ. Moving between platforms usually means a new motherboard and often new memory.